Linear search arrays
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this helpful for you Instead of returning matching elements, you could print out their index values (allowing multiple values to be printed) or insert them into an array and then return that.
|
How does java.util.Collections.contains() perform faster than a linear search?
Tag : java , By : Steven Weber
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
help you fix your problem Your comparison code is buggy, and this is distorting your results. This does search for the target if (ints.contains(target)) {
// nothing
}
for (Integer i : ints) {
// nothing
}
Iterator<Integer> it = ints.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
Integer i = (Integer) it.next();
}
|
Does Python's `in` keyword perform a linear search?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
help you fix your problem Python's in operator calls the __contains__ magic function on the container. That is implemented in different ways for different containers. For strings, lists and tuples, it's a linear search (O(N)), though since it's implemented in C it will probably be faster than the pure-python one you have in your question.
|
How do I perform a linear search over this inventory array then the index of the matching item if it is found, -1 if it
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
it fixes the issue for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
if (sku_item == items[i]._sku) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
|
How can I use the Find method to perform a case insensitive search on the database field?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
With these it helps The easiest way I've found to handle this and case-insensitive unique indexes with PG/Sails is to use the citext column type instead of text/character varying types (compared to forcing everything to lowercase which stinks). citext is a case insensitive text datatype. "Essentially, it internally calls lower when comparing values. Otherwise, it behaves almost exactly like text." username: {
type: 'string',
columnType: 'citext',
required: true,
unique: true,
description: 'A users.. Username',
// ...
},
|