The benefits of Flink Kafka Stream over Spark Kafka Stream? And Kafka Stream over Flink?
Date : November 22 2020, 11:00 PM
wish help you to fix your issue You understanding about micro-batch vs stream processing is correct. You are also right, that all three system use the standard Java consumer that is provided by Kafka to pull data for processing in an infinite loop. The main difference is, that Spark needs to schedule a new job for each micro batch it processes. And this scheduling overhead in quite high, such that Spark cannot handle very low batch intervals like 100ms or 50ms efficiently and thus throughput goes down for those small batches.
|
Exception when processing data during Kafka stream process
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
may help you . You have to specify the correct Serdes for the to() operation, too. Otherwise, it uses the default Serdes from the StreamsConfig and this ByteArraySerde -- and String cannot be cast to byte[]. You need to do: .to(streamoutputtopic, Produced.with(Serdes.String(), Serdes.String()));
|
When using kafka+beam+flink. Found interface org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.InternalTimer, but class was expec
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|
How to get the processing kafka topic name dynamically in Flink Kafka Consumer?
Tag : java , By : Fernando
Date : November 24 2020, 05:48 AM
fixed the issue. Will look into that further You can implement your own custom KafkaDeserializationSchema, like this: public class CustomKafkaDeserializationSchema implements KafkaDeserializationSchema<Tuple2<String, String>> {
@Override
public boolean isEndOfStream(Tuple2<String, String> nextElement) {
return false;
}
@Override
public Tuple2<String, String> deserialize(ConsumerRecord<byte[], byte[]> record) throws Exception {
return new Tuple2<>(record.topic(), new String(record.value(), "UTF-8"));
}
@Override
public TypeInformation<Tuple2<String, String>> getProducedType() {
return new TupleTypeInfo<>(BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO, BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO);
}
}
FlinkKafkaConsumer010<Tuple2<String, String>> kafkaConsumer = new FlinkKafkaConsumer010<>(
topicPattern, new CustomKafkaDeserializationSchema, kafkaConsumerProps);
DataStream<Tuple2<String, String>> input = env.addSource(kafkaConsumer);
input.process(new ProcessFunction<Tuple2<String,String>, String>() {
@Override
public void processElement(Tuple2<String, String> value, Context ctx, Collector<String> out) throws Exception {
String topicName = value.f0;
// your processing logic here.
out.collect(value.f1);
}
});
|
Passing elements back to the input stream, after processing, in Flink?
Tag : java , By : mhedberg
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
help you fix your problem Here are two solutions. They are more-or-less equivalent in their underlying behavior, but you might find one or the other easier to understand, maintain, or test. As for your question, no, there is no way to loop back (re-queue) the unconsumed events without pushing them back to Kinesis. But simply holding on to them until they are needed should be fine.
|