logo
down
shadow

OpenAcc Intel Fortran Compiler


OpenAcc Intel Fortran Compiler

Content Index :

OpenAcc Intel Fortran Compiler
Tag : fortran , By : Nulq
Date : November 28 2020, 11:01 PM

This might help you The PGI Community Edition is a free release of PGI Fortran, C, and C++ compilers and tools including OpenACC, OpenMP, and CUDA Fortran for Linux/x86, Linux/OpenPOWER, and macOS. Look here http://www.pgroup.com/products/community.htm.

Comments
No Comments Right Now !

Boards Message :
You Must Login Or Sign Up to Add Your Comments .

Share : facebook icon twitter icon

Intel Visual Fortran Compiler name mangling, is my compiler just being crazy?


Tag : development , By : amy
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I hope this helps you . I found out the issue was because I had some DLL export statements for those symbols when I really didn't need them. It made the compiler expect _imp_sybmol because I was exporting them using the statement:
    !DEC$ATTRIBUTES STDCALL:: YOURSYMBOL
!DEC$ATTRIBUTES DLLEXPORT:: YOURSYMBOL

License Intel Fortran compiler


Tag : matlab , By : Menno
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Does that help There is academic license available from Intel, just look in their e-shop or ask your local reseller. It is not free of charge, however. I am using compiler covered by this license every day. It should include also the binary redistribution, but much better place for questions like this is the Intel Support Forums

Correct suffix for Fortran 2003 source file - Intel Fortran compiler


Tag : development , By : Francis
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
around this issue There is nothing in the standard that specifies the suffix of the files. Intel always stated, that they treat *.f90 as the suffix for the free source format irrespective of the standard version. It is just a convention not based on any standard document.
Maybe the f90 suffix is little unfortunate, looking like just for Fortran 90, but you shouldn't hesitate to use it for every free-format source file.

Compiling OpenACC Fortran code with Cray compiler


Tag : development , By : afarouk
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this helpful for you You set the target by loading the appropriate module before compilation. You probably want this target:
module load craype-accel-nvidia35

GNU compiler segmentation fault when calling C function from Fortran, but Intel compiler works well


Tag : fortran , By : kokok13
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
may help you . There are multiple problems in the program. First is just a C one. Do you disable compiler warnings? My gcc complains that
> gfortran value.c value.f90
value.c: In function ‘call_fc’:
value.c:7:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘malloc’ [enabled by default]
     double *y = malloc(s*sizeof(double));
             ^
#include <stdlib.h>
integer(c_int), value :: s
Related Posts Related QUESTIONS :
  • Is RETURN statement before END SUBROUTINE in Fortran codes considered a good practice?
  • Wrong result for the Inverse Matrix
  • How to read the real and complex numbers in a unified way in Fortran?
  • Ignoring the intrinsic gamma function with gfortran
  • Can't input value in f(x) in this Fortran code?
  • Fortran can't read from file
  • Comparing elements of a Fortran matrix to the average of the entire matrix and remembering the index of the number close
  • Using MPI_PUT in fortran and different ranks have different displacements using c_loc
  • Is there a Gfortran flag similar to intel ifort's -ipo-c, that would generate single optimized object from all compiled
  • What does o'377' mean in Fortran 77?
  • How can I specify in fortran compiler that declared variables shoud not be potentially treated as implicit function decl
  • What does this syntax mean in fortran?
  • shadow
    Privacy Policy - Terms - Contact Us © scrbit.com