Pipes and callbacks in Haskell
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Does that help The simplest solution is to use MVars to communicate between the callback and Producer. Here's how: import Control.Proxy
import Control.Concurrent.MVar
fromMVar :: (Proxy p) => MVar (Maybe a) -> () -> Producer p a IO ()
fromMVar mvar () = runIdentityP loop where
loop = do
ma <- lift $ takeMVar mvar
case ma of
Nothing -> return ()
Just a -> do
respond a
loop
>>> mvar <- newEmptyMVar :: IO (MVar (Maybe Int))
>>> forkIO $ runProxy $ fromMVar mvar >-> printD
>>> putMVar mvar (Just 1)
1
>>> putMVar mvar (Just 2)
2
>>> putMVar mvar Nothing
>>> putMVar mvar (Just 3)
>>>
|
Differences between 2 ways of Rails module included callbacks?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you I'm new to Rails. I have a model called AdvItem, basically what I want to do is to move all its validation statements to a module named AdvItemValidation. After some searches here's what I get: , The form below def self.included(base)
|
Two callbacks separated by double pipes?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
This might help you The || operand means "OR", that is, use the success callback if it exists, OR if it does not exist, use onSuccess.
|
Difference between 2 ways working with pipes using ARGF?
Tag : ruby , By : jedameron
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
may help you . As Stefan mentioned, you did a little mistake in second case. Proper way of using "ARGF.gets" approach in your case will look like: while input = ARGF.gets
# input here represents a line
end
print while gets
|
Is there a difference between this two ways of doing callbacks (jQuery)?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
This might help you I'm just starting to learn jQuery and I've seen this. I don't know if there is any difference or which one would be better. , The callback to .fadeOut call fires when fade out finishes. So this myDiv.fadeOut('fast', function() {
myDiv.removeClass('slide');
});
myDiv.fadeOut('fast').removeClass('slide');
|