ABAC Attributes Resolution
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Any of those help On request to PDP shall we pass all possible attributes that we are having? As far as I understood this will increase performance as it will allow to filter out by policy's target a lot of policies.
|
ABAC PIP Attributes Request
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
With these it helps The following approach is based on XACML model. If you need a solution that better handle cases where some of the resource attributes are missing from requests, let us know. I can update my answer, but the solution is more complex since it adds more checks for empty/undefined attributes. I use a simplified syntax but you can easily translate to XACML with these few conventions:
|
What should ABAC PIP do in case of attributes resolution impossibility?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
seems to work fine The interaction between the PDP and the PIP is not specified in the XACML standard. It is down to each implementation (AuthZForce, Axiomatics...) to determine how they handle each case. Generally speaking, there are 3 errors that can occur when using a PIP:
|
using open policy agent (OPA) as an ABAC system
Date : December 05 2020, 12:10 PM
may help you . I have a project that requires ABAC for access control for my projects resources. I've been looking at OPA and authzforce as options to implement ABAC and OPA looks like it might be less complicated than authzforce. I see that OPA compares itself to other systems and paradigms but the example it gave for ABAC leaves a lot to be desired. Mainly because ABAC requires the use of points that enforce policies, makes decisions around policies, fetch subject and object attributes for policy decisions. I feel like OPA has everything but the last part covered but it's hard to tell if that's true since their ABAC example is just a one-off. , OPA looks like it might be less complicated than authzforce
|
Writing a sample ABAC authorization policy using ALFA and XACML
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|