Why does my Access SQL VBA code jump out of the Sub?

I think the issue was by ths following , I will be using some jQuery below this chunk of code (which I may rewrite as jQuery). jQuery is loaded. But I don't understand why, when I step through this code in the debugger, the debugger jumps into jQuery on the line indicated, and I am get the error that "UL.appendChild" is not a function.

// Here UL will be the id attribute, not the <ul> element.
var UL = document.createElement('ul').id = 'meta-ul';

// this doesn't makes sense... (id.appendChild)
UL.appendChild(li1) ;

// solution:
var UL = document.createElement('ul');
UL.id = 'meta-ul';

wish help you to fix your issue I use ripper-tags with vim
https://github.com/tmm1/ripper-tags

ripper-tags -R .

it should still fix some issue If you are confused about the opcode you are a long way from understanding this. You need to start with documentation on the instruction set. which for x86 is plentiful, its not great documentation but still the opcodes are pretty clear. With instruction sets like this not hard to find a web page with a chart of opcodes and then you click on that to find the rest of the instruction definition.
Fairly typical that the relative address is based on the byte after the instruction. If you were working on a team for a brand new processor, then you would just go down to one of the chip folks cubes and ask (since it wouldnt be well documented yet) but since this is an old design there are tools available that will simply give you your answer without asking anyone else.

a0: jle a0
a1: jle a1
a2: jle a2
a3: jle a3
a4: jle a4

b0: jle b1
b1: jle b2
b2: jle b3
b3: jle b4
b4: jle b5
b5: nop

c0: jle c0
c1: jle c0
c2: jle c0
c3: jle c0
c4: jle c0

d0: jle d4
d1: jle d4
d2: jle d4
d3: jle d4
d4: jle d4

0000000000000000 <a0>:
   0:   7e fe                   jle    0 <a0>
0000000000000002 <a1>:
   2:   7e fe                   jle    2 <a1>
0000000000000004 <a2>:
   4:   7e fe                   jle    4 <a2>
0000000000000006 <a3>:
   6:   7e fe                   jle    6 <a3>
0000000000000008 <a4>:
   8:   7e fe                   jle    8 <a4>
000000000000000a <b0>:
   a:   7e 00                   jle    c <b1>
000000000000000c <b1>:
   c:   7e 00                   jle    e <b2>
000000000000000e <b2>:
   e:   7e 00                   jle    10 <b3>
0000000000000010 <b3>:
  10:   7e 00                   jle    12 <b4>
0000000000000012 <b4>:
  12:   7e 00                   jle    14 <b5>
0000000000000014 <b5>:
  14:   90                      nop
0000000000000015 <c0>:
  15:   7e fe                   jle    15 <c0>
0000000000000017 <c1>:
  17:   7e fc                   jle    15 <c0>
0000000000000019 <c2>:
  19:   7e fa                   jle    15 <c0>
000000000000001b <c3>:
  1b:   7e f8                   jle    15 <c0>
000000000000001d <c4>:
  1d:   7e f6                   jle    15 <c0>
000000000000001f <d0>:
  1f:   7e 06                   jle    27 <d4>
0000000000000021 <d1>:
  21:   7e 04                   jle    27 <d4>
0000000000000023 <d2>:
  23:   7e 02                   jle    27 <d4>
0000000000000025 <d3>:
  25:   7e 00                   jle    27 <d4>
0000000000000027 <d4>:
  27:   7e fe                   jle    27 <d4>

804839c: 7e 0d      jle   80483ab <silly+0x17>

will help you The logic of collision undoes the clamping in X if Y is also out of bounds. Try clamping in both x and y and then update the body if there's a change:

  public void collision() {
    Rectangle body = jan.getBody();
    int bodyX = (int) body.getX();
    int bodyY = (int) body.getY();
    int clampedBodyX = Math.min(Math.max(0, bodyX), 780);
    int clampedBodyY = Math.min(Math.max(0, bodyY), 360);
    if (bodyX != clampedBodyX || bodyY != clampedBodyY) {
      body.setLocation(clampedBodyX, clampedBodyY);
      jan.setBody(body);
    }
  }

Does that help @jonrsharpe gave me the resources to answer this question, so thanks! check this out here, it will give you all the information you will need: info on viewing code coverage results
this feature can be accessed by clicking on the coloured line by your code and clicking on a button called 'show tests covering line' this option is only available if you enable 'tracing' for your code coverage. this option can be enabled from configuring the test task. info on this bit here: info on configuring run profiles for code coverage