Overloading operators with non-member functions
Tag : cpp , By : Sebastian Gift
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
like below fixes the issue With a member function, this would be the left hand side parameter, meaning your operator would only have one argument (or none for unary operators). With a freestanding function, you must supply either two or one arguments for binary or unary operators, respectively. A good example is the << operator for streams: class T;
// ...
std::ostream & operator<<(std::ostream &os, const T &val)
{
// ...
return os;
}
std::cout << "Hello";
operator<<(std::cout, "Hello");
|
C# Error: The call is ambiguous between the following methods or properties. Overloading operators
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
like below fixes the issue No, it's got nothing to do with different namespaces - it's that you've got the same operator signature declared in two places: public static Dollar operator +(Euro eu, Dollar dol)
public static Euro operator +(Euro eu, Dollar dol)
// In Dollar
public Dollar Plus(Euro eu)
// In Euro
public Dollar Plus(Dollar dol)
Euro euro00 = new Euro(1);
Dollar dollar00 = new Dollar(1);
Euro sumaEuros = euro00.Plus(dollar00);
public static Dollar operator +(Dollar dol, Euro eu)
public static Euro operator +(Euro eu, Dollar dol)
Dollar dol1 = ...;
Euro eu1 = ...;
Dollar dol2 = dol1 + eu1;
Euro eu2 = eu1 + do1;
|
Overloading operators using extension methods
Tag : chash , By : Jonathan Bernard
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Does that help C# already "lifts" all operators onto nullable types. If either operand is null, the operator will return null.
|
Overloading I/O operators with a non-friend method in C++ | &istream and &ostream functions
Tag : cpp , By : ChaseVoid
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I hope this helps . Just create [virtual] member functions read() and write() each taking a corresponding stream and call them from the respective operator: class String {
// ...
public:
virtual std::istream& read(std::istream& in);
virtual std::ostream& write(std::ostream& out) const;
};
std::istream& operator>> (std::istream& in, String& s) {
return s.read(in);
}
std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& out, String const& s) {
return s.write(out);
}
|
C++14 type lists, any reason to prefer 'free functions' to 'methods' or vice versa?
Tag : cpp , By : user181945
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|