implicit declaration of function ‘strtok_r’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] inspite including <string.h>
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
With these it helps strtok_r is not a standard C function. You have asked for only C99 by using the -std=c99compiler flag, so the header files (of glibc) will only make the standard C99 functions in string.h available to you. Enable extensions by using -std=gnu99 , or by defining one of the extensions, shown in the manpage of strtok , that supports strtok_r before including string.h. E.g. #define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <string.h>
|
implicit declaration of function ‘memset’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
Tag : c , By : user123585
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will be helpful for those in need I have the following c code: , Add #include <string.h>
|
difference between normal function declaration and inside return block function declaration in Javascript
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish help you to fix your issue If you return an object from a function, then invoke that as a constructor with new, the original this of the function is THROWN AWAY AND IGNORED AND LOST FOREVER. In other words, the value of this.firstName is never again accessible in this world. What are you trying to accomplish by returning that object literal?
|
warning: implicit declaration of function 'Min' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I hope this helps . When your teacher calls up a student who is absent in the class, all students may yell "He isn't here!" Lets look at the warning: minVal = Min(x, y, z);
void minVal (double x, double y, double z, double minVal)
#include <stdio.h>
double Min(double x, double y, double z)
{
if (x<y && x<z)
return x;
else if (y<x && y<z)
return y;
else if (z<x && z<y)
return z;
else
return 0.0;
}
int main(void)
{
double x, y, z, minVal = 0.0;
printf("Please enter three numeric values: ");
scanf("%lf%lf%lf", &x, &y, &z);
minVal = Min(x, y, z);
printf("Min(%0.10f, %0.10f, %0.10f) = %0.10f\n", x, y, z, minVal);
return 0;
}
|
warning: implicit declaration of function ‘gets’; did you mean ‘fgets’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish helps you On Ubuntu, run man gets in a terminal. It should show you this gets(3) man page. That documentation states, in written English:
|
Boards Message :
Related QUESTIONS :