Thread object in event method: use class member or create local object?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you You can't use the second code without reinitializing your Thread on each OnClick(). This is because once a Thread has finished running, it is "dead." Thus, subsequent calls to start() will fail and result in an IllegalThreadStateException.
It would be better to use the first code, as the GC will remove the Thread after it has completed.
|
How to start thread using object member function of non-copyable non-movable class?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish of those help There are multiple ways to do what you want:
Pass pointer instead: std::thread t1(&FooMutex::foo, &o); Use std::bind: std::thread t1(std::bind(&FooMutex::foo, &o)); Use std::bind: std::thread t1(&FooMutex::foo, std::ref(o)); Use lambda function: std::thread t1([&o]() { o.foo(); });
|
Is it thread safe when 2 threads modifies different member of a class object concurrently?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
like below fixes the issue It depends. As you mentioned, when the object is queue node, by enqueuing and dequeuing, two threads won't conflict, if they access the node member respectively.
|
Not able to call class member function in a separate thread using C++11 thread class
Tag : cpp , By : nobodyzzz
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|
C++ - Loop Efficiency: Storing temporarly values of a class member Vs pointer to this member
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|
Boards Message :
Related QUESTIONS :