Java Generics: Generic type defined as return type only
Tag : java , By : user161380
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this will help The method returns a type of whatever you expect it to be ( is defined in the method and is absolutely unbounded). This is very, very dangerous as no provision is made that the return type actually matches the returned value.
|
Java - Overriding return type of extended interface when return type uses generics for own method parameter types
Tag : java , By : Dasharath Yadav
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
To fix this issue A basic idea is now to change this generic return type from GenericType in Interface A into GenericType in Interface A1
|
Java- Using generics to return more than one type
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish help you to fix your issue There are a number of approaches you could take. One is to use Class as others have suggested. Another would be to create some sort of producer interface, and pass that in:public interface FruitProducer<T> {
T createFruit(String arg);
}
public <T> List<T> returnFruits(String arg, FruitProducer<? extends T> producer) {
List<T> list = new ArrayList<T>();
T fruit = producer.createFruit(arg);
list.add(fruit);
return list;
}
public abstract class FruitLister<T> {
public abstract List<T> returnFruits(String arg);
}
public class AppleLister implements FruitLister<Apple> {
@Override
public List<Apple> returnFruits(String arg) {
List<Apple> list = new ArrayList<Apple>();
Apple apple = new Apple(arg);
list.add(apple);
return list;
}
}
|
New to Java Generics - why is there a Type for a return type of void in Generics?
Tag : java , By : Adam Hill
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
seems to work fine The isn't a return type. It is declaring that U is a generic class that will be used in the method's parameters and in the method body. You can read more about generic methods and their syntax here.
|
Java Generics : cant call a function with said generics even though type matches
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Hope that helps The problem is at line 7, you are creating new Config and call setSections on the same line. So the solutions are two: Config<String> config = new Config<String>().setSections(sections);
Config<String> config = new Config<>();
conf.setSections(sections);
|