Why does Map not extend Collection interface
Tag : java , By : David B
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this one helps. Collection assume elements of one value. Map assumes entries of key/value pairs. They could have been engineered to re-use the same common interface however some methods they implement are incompatible e.g. Collection.remove(Object) - removes an element.
Map.remove(Object) - removes by key, not by entry.
|
How to extend an interface with object resulting in new interface with object props merged into interface prototype?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this help you You can indeed do this but you need to specify that the type of the value being intersected with the xtn object is a constructor that instantiates the resulting values. The signature of extend therefore should look like function extend<T, K>(cls: new (...args: {}[]) => T, xtn: K): new (...args: {}[]) => T & K;
function extend<T, K>(cls: (...args: {}[]) => T, xtn: K): new (...args: {}[]) => T & K;
function extend<T, K>(cls: new (...args: {}[]) => T, xtn: K): new (...args: {}[]) => T & K;
|
Does a class which implements an interface's method (without explicitly implementing that interface) extend that specifi
Tag : java , By : user186831
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
should help you out Yes, it is right. Java doesn't use duck-typing as JavaScript or TypeScript. A solution is to create an adapter class that wraps a Integer, delegates to it, and actually implement the interface. public interface HasDoubleValue{
double doubleValue();
}
final class IntegerHasDoubleValueAdapter implements HasDoubleValue {
private final Integer i;
public IntegerHasDoubleValueAdapter(Integer i) {
this.i = i;
}
@Override
public double doubleValue() {
return i.doubleValue();
}
}
class Data<O extends HasDoubleValue> {
void put(O o) {}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer i = 42;
Data<IntegerHasDoubleValueAdapter> d1 = new Data<>();
d1.put(new IntegerHasDoubleValueAdapter(i));
Data<HasDoubleValue> d2 = new Data<>();
d2.put(() -> i.doubleValue());
Data<HasDoubleValue> d3 = new Data<>();
d3.put(i::doubleValue);
}
}
|
In java, is an interface providing parameters to extend a parameterized interface an exact synonym of it?
Tag : java , By : yew tree
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
may help you . What you are looking for is called a type alias. Java unfortunately does not have them.
|
Why methods in Collection interface are again declared in List Interface though List extends Collection
Tag : java , By : Nandor Devai
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
hope this fix your issue A method in a sub-interface may have different behavior (or at least a more specific behavior) than a method of the super interface having the exact same signature. Therefore, it is very useful, for example, for the users of the List interface to know that add
|