scala parallel collections degree of parallelism
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
it should still fix some issue Is there any equivalent in scala parallel collections to LINQ's withDegreeOfParallelism which sets the number of threads which will run a query? I want to run an operation in parallel which needs to have a set number of threads running. , With the newest trunk, using the JVM 1.6 or newer, use the: collection.parallel.ForkJoinTasks.defaultForkJoinPool.setParallelism(parlevel: Int)
scala> import scala.collection.parallel._
import scala.collection.parallel._
scala> val pc = mutable.ParArray(1, 2, 3)
pc: scala.collection.parallel.mutable.ParArray[Int] = ParArray(1, 2, 3)
scala> pc.tasksupport = new ForkJoinTaskSupport(new scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool(2))
pc.tasksupport: scala.collection.parallel.TaskSupport = scala.collection.parallel.ForkJoinTaskSupport@4a5d484a
scala> pc map { _ + 1 }
res0: scala.collection.parallel.mutable.ParArray[Int] = ParArray(2, 3, 4)
|
How to get maximum degree of parallelism for task parallel library usage?
Tag : chash , By : user123284
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you Parallel tasks are basically threads that can be shared. Because the number of active threads is limited by the number of logical processor cores that are available, a good guess would be to just take the number of logical cores available to the program. Environment.ProcessorCount
|
How to use task parallel library (TPL) with load balancing and limited degree of parallelism?
Tag : chash , By : Rit Li
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Does that help You should use TPL Dataflow's ActionBlock that encapsulates all that for you. It's an actor based framework that is part of the TPL: var block = new ActionBlock<Value>(
value => GetWriteValueTask(value, priority)
new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions()
{
MaxDegreeOfParallelism = GetMaxNrParallelWrites();
});
foreach (var value in values)
{
block.Post(value);
}
|
Not getting the right degree of parallelism for http queries when using Parallel.foreach
Tag : chash , By : Zinovate
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this will help I am trying to perform 2000 http queries at the same time. Tests conducted with this code (consisting mostly of responding servers) run in about 15 seconds : , -Why do I have such a difference in performance ? public async Task TestTasksProperly()
{
var urls = new List<string>();
urls.AddRange(createUrls());
var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
ConcurrentQueue<string> contents = new ConcurrentQueue<string>();
await Task.WhenAll(urls.Select(url => QueryUrl(url, contents)))).ConfigureAwait(false);
var time = stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds / 1000.0;
Console.WriteLine("Time spent in Tasks : " + time);
Console.WriteLine("Queue size : " + contents.Count);
}
private static async Task QueryUrl(string url, ConcurrentQueue<string> contents)
{
using (var client = new HttpClient {Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)})
{
using (var response = await client.GetAsync(url).ConfigureAwait(false))
{
try
{
var content = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
contents.Enqueue(content);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
}
}
}
}
|
Abort | remove delay() function if video is pauzed (do not delay anymore even if delay is not finished)
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
around this issue I make subtitles system for my video. Right now I am at the stage where subtitle - a box with a text should be shown on spesific second and on spesific position and then after x seconds fade out. However I am stuck at this: if I pauze a video when subtitle is still shown - I want it to remain shown but it runs out of that x seconds and hides anyways. , This should work: $('.sub').stop(true)
|