“interpreter readable” printing (in R)
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
To fix this issue I am wondering whether there is a way to print objects in an “interpreter readable” way, which would do something looking like this: , Use dput() for this: x <- c(1:5,8)
dput(x)
c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8)
x <- matrix(1:4, ncol=2)
dput(x)
structure(1:4, .Dim = c(2L, 2L))
z <- structure(1:4, .Dim = c(2L, 2L))
z
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 1 3
[2,] 2 4
|
Interpreter in Scheme
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish helps you There is a difference: intepret interprets one single expression. interpret-block takes the several statements in the one block expression and use interpret on each one. interpret will do the "right thing", like call interpret-declaration, based on the type of expression. interpret-block will have a vital role in state handling. eg. declare would return a new state that next statements needs to get as argument. I guess all calls to interpret gets a state back and in interpret-block would always return the passed state back to clear new bindings.
|
In a scheme interpreter in scheme, how to implement 'quote'?
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you So as stated in the comments, this is an issue with REPL printing, and the correct implementation is: (quotation [(Q datum) $2])
|
Determine definition and parameter of a Scheme function in the interpreter? / How are functions stored in Scheme?
Tag : scheme , By : user184406
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|
Scheme interpreter in Go
Tag : go , By : Martin Kopp
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|